Mongolian defamation laws used to curb media
That freedom of expression is still a precarious right in Mongolia is clear from the IFEX (International Freedom of Expression eXchange) report on Mongolia. To quote the report:
That we're not dealing with a few single incidents spread over decades is clear from IFEX's list of incidents, and one can only assume this is an incomplete list.
And IFEX is not alone in reporting such violations. Both the IPI (International Press Institute) and Reporters sans frontières also have recorded such incidents.
That reports on corruption aren't just figments of the minds of over-zealous journalists is clear from the 2005 report on corruption in Mongolia conducted under the authority of USAID. That report makes for some interesting but sad reading too. It pinpoints the sore spots accurately but also presents suggestions to how corruption could be prevented or diverted. The report is critical but diplomatic. It should be read and understood as serious but concerned advice to the Mongolian government in particular and the population in general.
In Mongolia, politicians are increasingly taking advantage of punitive defamation laws to silence journalists who report on sensitive issues such as government corruption, reports Globe International.
According to a recent Globe International survey of the capital Ulaanbaatar's six district courts, 121 defamation charges have been initiated against journalists and media organisations between 2001 and 2004.
In 33 of these cases, the journalists were charged with libel as a result of complaints made by politicians. Another 13 lawsuits were initiated by public officials and organisations.
That we're not dealing with a few single incidents spread over decades is clear from IFEX's list of incidents, and one can only assume this is an incomplete list.
And IFEX is not alone in reporting such violations. Both the IPI (International Press Institute) and Reporters sans frontières also have recorded such incidents.
That reports on corruption aren't just figments of the minds of over-zealous journalists is clear from the 2005 report on corruption in Mongolia conducted under the authority of USAID. That report makes for some interesting but sad reading too. It pinpoints the sore spots accurately but also presents suggestions to how corruption could be prevented or diverted. The report is critical but diplomatic. It should be read and understood as serious but concerned advice to the Mongolian government in particular and the population in general.


3 Comments:
At 5:23 PM,
Garrett
said…
I do not wish to defend government officials for I believe they are not free from corruption, but in this argument, one has to consider the unethical practices of journalists in Mongolia who use unfounded sources when they come out with stories "exposing" government officials. If a journalist can't back up his/her story with facts, it shouldn't be reported, and if false, is libel/slander by definition, which is punishable by law.
At 5:41 PM,
RML
said…
Garret, I agree with you in principle but... these journalists aren't the only ones who report on the (growing) corruption in Mongolia. The USAID report is also pretty clear on that subject and if you'd read the report, you'd see that that report also states that it is very difficult to gather concrete evidence for such practices. The "why" is simple: corruption takes place behind closed doors, in secrecy and without written proof.
I can remember a case where a US President had to resign on (then) unsubstanciated claims of abuse of power. That time the government also tried to muzzle the media. Thankfully, two very brave reporters kept digging away, resulting ultimately exposing Nixon's unlawful behaviour as a President.
At 6:30 PM,
Anonymous
said…
You dont need much concrete evidence to accuse our politians of corruption, just look at the cars they drive and the assets they own...earning mostly $300-$400 a month and driving cars worth $60,000.
Post a Comment
<< Home